Thinking differently about your
work means thinking about different kinds of work.
We all know what we’ll to be doing
today. But where are the people passing us on the street going to work, and
what will they be doing when they get there? Wondering about it, talking about it with some of those people,
maybe even tagging along with them for a day can blow out the walls when
thinking about what you should be doing with your own work life.
Unfortunately,
our “wondering” tends to be pretty timid. That’s because our focus usually
gravitates to people who look a lot like us (are they more successful, making more money?), or who seem higher
up the ladder (are their lives easier and
more satisfying than mine is?). But what about looking less timidly, so
that it’s not simply confirming what you already know, but about building your
thinking around entirely different foundations?
TWELVE CORNER
STONE - CUZCO
I
heard Charles Alan Murray speak at
Bryn Mawr the other night. Among other things, he illustrated how the bubbles
we inhabit with all our preconceptions are fortified by the ways we live.
In many of our neighborhoods, nearly
everyone is, for all intents and purposes, the same. The education we’ve had.
The cars we drive and stores we shop in. The TV shows we all watch (or don’t
watch). The sameness of our surroundings bolsters the image we have of
ourselves. But it can be pretty thin
gruel after awhile.
Aren’t we confident enough to open
the windows around our certainties, allowing our lives to be enriched by what
can be learned by living and thinking a little differently?
Murray
talked about looking, years ago, for a place to locate his young family around
his research job as a political scientist in Washington D.C. The usual suspects were the affluent,
inner ring suburbs like MacLean Virginia, where the well educated and upwardly
mobile were looking for “good schools” and a mirror of their hoped-for success.
Murray made a conscious choice to look elsewhere, choosing a small town of a
couple of hundred people in rural Frederick County. He did so because he wanted to school his children around
people who worked with their hands, ran small stores, didn’t have degrees from
Harvard and MIT like he did. “More enriching for me and for them,” he said.
Murray
was also scrambling the expectations others had about him.
The
prison I’m talking about is one that you, as well as others, busily maintain
for you.
I recently had a candid conversation about this kind of straightjacketed
thinking with Timothy Rub, 2½ years
in as director of the Philadelphia Museum of Art. As he’s discussed elsewhere, the museum director’s
challenge is to bring the past into “fruitful conversation” with the present so
that it’s possible to imagine different futures. In this, a great museum’s “present purpose” is to be “the
foundation stone, indeed the catalyst for innovation and creativity” in the community. But in this (as in so much else), it
comes down to the people involved: to his stewardship and to those who hold that trust with him. How, he wondered, can we breathe new possibility into great institutions when so many of our stewards seem unwilling to think differently?
irraa@Flickr
THE PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART
There’s little to be lost, and the promise of a better world
gained, when you re-open basic questions you thought you'd answered—once and
for all—a long time ago.
Broadening your base of operations
can support better work, a richer life, and more consequential futures.
It’s time to start thinking outside your box.
2 comments:
David, I enjoy reading your post. It's hard to explain that the sameness in life, no matter how accomplished or affluent the surrounding is, can leave one feeling stagnated, restricted and dissatisfied. I agree with you, exposing oneself to something different can help broadening the base of operation. Personally, I find it easier to change or shift the base of operation completely to create progress, like changing the gear and then the lane in traffic. Living differently encourages thinking and feeling differently faster. Personally quite satisfying.
I'm amazed by how straitjacketed people are in their preconceived ideas. Large corporations rearrange the deck chairs for decades but cannot see that their ship is sinking. I had an odd conversation with a beloved, highly intelligent friend a month ago who couldn't see that my response to a framework of ideas he'd proposed was in fact a proposal to look at an even larger, deeper framework of ideas. And, then, how often do *I* fail, without even realizing it, to escape my straitjackets?
Post a Comment